Archive for the ‘Comments’ Category

Now It’s Personal, Mister Mayor Man

Tuesday, June 7th, 2011

Mister Mayor Man, two things that people observed about your behavior last night when I was commenting – first, your attempt to turn my microphone off, and second, that you lost your cool with me and basically told me to shut up.  Way to go, Mister Mayor Man!  You surely are a great representative of the City of Bartlesville!

My elderly father nearly had his ear ripped off because you and your cronies on the BRTA didn’t do your job and allowed a brand new hotel to be built and opened that does not comply with the ADA.  It is galling that millions of taxpayer dollars were spent to subsidize this hotel that deoes not comply with the ADA.  The ADA is FEDERAL LAW, and has been around for 20 years – there is absolutely no excuse for any new facility to be built that does not comply.  Just because you are Tom Gorman does not mean that you and your cronies can just ignore FEDERAL law.  Like I said last night in public before you tried to cut me off and shout me down, whomever had the oversight responsibility to make sure that a facility open to the public and built with public dollars was ADA compliant either was corrupt, and knowingly turned a blind-eye to shoddy construction for a quid pro quo (such as job security), or a nitwit that didn’t know a thing about the ADA.  Sorry if you found that to be insulting to city staff, but the reality is what it is – either the person for oversight was on the take or was not competent to do the job.  Honestly, I don’t know which is worse – a corrupt official or a stupid one.  But the ultimate responsibility rests with you, Mister Mayor Man, as you were, and are still on, the BRTA, and the BRTA funded the project and was supposed to provide oversight.  Some oversight.

My father harmed no one.  No, he was trying to bathe himself when he slipped on the slippery bathtub, and reached for the grab bars, only to find that one of the required grab bars wasn’t there.  He then grabbed the shower curtain to break his fall, and fell against the commode, which, according to ADA shouldn’t have been so close to the tub, and almost ripped his ear off as his head smashed against the porcelain.  And then, incredibly, my father being the decent man that he is, apologized to the front desk as we were transporting him to the hospital for making a mess.  Think about that, Mister Mayor Man – my father, the builder and engineer, falls and almost rips his ear off because on a project you and your cronies were overseeing someone decided that it would be okay to leave off a grab bar, and instead of being angry over the damage done to him, feels sorry for the damage he did to the room.  You hurt him, yet he apologized.

You lost your patience with me because I was a little upset.  How would you feel if it had been your father that had been hurt?  I guarantee you, you would have had lawyers filing suits before the blood even dried.  How you could sit there with that smug look on your face knowing that a project you are your cronies oversaw hurt somebody was beyond me.  I’ve heard the rumors throughout town about how shortcuts were taken when the hotel was built; now we know what they were.  Who needs the required slip-proof flooring, when you can get the slick stuff so much cheaper.  No one will ever know; no one will ever be the wiser.  After all, when someone does fall, we can just blame it on them, right?  I almost fell in the lobby one day when it was raining, and the solution was that the hotel put up a “CAUTION – SLIPPERY” sign, which everyone knows is actually a transformer that will grab you when you slip on the non-ADA compliant floor.  Who needs the extra grab bar in the bathtub, right?  They are just handicapped people, just a bunch of whiny crybabies.   Why should the commode be the proper distance away from the bathtub?  After all, you shouldn’t be falling out of the bathtub to begin with; it’s all your fault!

When I complained to the front desk, I was told it was my father’s fault that he fell because he should have been in a “handicapped” room.  Yes, the hotel built with taxpayer money is non-ADA compliant, but yet it is my father’s fault because he didn’t request one of the five (out of 150) “handicapped” rooms with a roll-in shower.  My father is not in a wheelchair, so a roll-in shower is not needed.  Oh, and apparently, all of the “handicapped” rooms only have a king bed, and when my parents travel, they travel with one of my sisters, and they need two beds, not one.  But, none of the “handicapped” rooms had two beds, which is also a violation of the ADA, which clearly states that handicapped people must have access to the same type of facilities as non-handicapped people.  Given that the “handicapped” rooms would not work, I asked for a shower mat for my father, and was told that they didn’t have any.   What?  Pay all that money for a hotel room, and the hotel can’t even afford to buy some shower mats for guests to use?  Un-freakin’-believable!

My father just had his stitches removed, and we don’t know yet what kind of permanent damage was done to his ear or his hearing.  He is a good man, who has always done right by others, and he doesn’t deserve this indignity.  I blame you, Mister Mayor Man.  A lot of people were upset how you and your cronies on the BRTA crammed this new hotel down our throats, and then poked us in the eye by using millions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize it.  I blame your cronies in the City for not obviously not inspecting the hotel thoroughly enough to make sure it complies with FEDERAL LAW such as the ADA before declaring it safe for public use and issuing a CO.  There is no excuse, absolutely none, for issuing a CO for a non-ADA compliant building, and like I said, I want to know exactly who issued it and who was responsible for oversight, because apparently there was none.  One of the primary functions of government is to promote the common good, and with regards to this project, the government, and all those working on its behalf, failed miserably.  And a good man was harmed.

Another Reason I Am Proud To Be An Okie!

Friday, April 29th, 2011

State Representative Sally Kern, that lovable Republican from Oklahoma City, is at it again!  You remember Sally – the one woman crusader against homosexuals, who stated that gays are the biggest threat to national security.  Yeah, that one.  Oklahoma’s own crackpot!  (Okay, in the Oklahoma Legislature, that applies to just about all of them, but Sally is the standout crackpot.)  Well,she gave a speech on the floor of the Oklahoma House advocating chunking affirmative action.  Her reason?  Women and minorities are lazier than white men and don’t deserve as much pay!  Of course, she is the expert, because she used to be a school teacher and observed how women and minorities just didn’t perform.  Of course, given her logic, does that mean her district should be smaller than those of her white male colleagues, because after all, she is a woman…

She apologized, and what did our wonderful Republican leadership do?  Absolutely nothing, as the apology was punishment enough.  And we wondering why our state is not growing and is getting poorer and poorer and poorer…..

To Each His Own, Or That’s How It Should Be

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Pulling up my City Councilperson’s election website, I was very disappointed to see both my County Commissioner, Mike Dunlap, and my State Representative, Earl Sears, on his campaign committee.  I have always viewed the vary offices, local, county, state, and federal, kind of like electron orbitals around an atom, that those electrons in each orbital only interact with the other electrons in that orbital and are completely independent of the electrons in the other orbitals.  In my atomic view of government, local officials are one orbital, county officials another, then state officials, then federal officials.  Carrying the atom analogy further, I expect that those electrons (officials) in one orbital only interact with other electrons in the same orbital.  Thus, local officials should only concern themselves with local elections, county officials with county elections, state officials with state elections, and federal officials with federal elections. 

I didn’t have a problem with a county official displaying a campaign sign or participating in a campaign for someone who is running for county office, as both offices are in the same orbital.  Same with state officeholders trying to help out others seeking state offices.  Or congressmen supporting other congressional and federal candidates.

I do have a problem when officeholders of one group get involved with the elections of another group.  For example, it is completely inappropriate for a city councilperson to take sides in a campaign for a county or state or federal office; whatever that councilperson’s personal preference, the official preference should be neutral.  After all, you never know who will win, and if the person you don’t support wins, that could poison the well of intergovernmental relations.  I also think it is completely wrong for a county or state or federal officeholder to be part of a campaign committee for a city council candidate, to use their name recognition to support one side.   This is sending the message that these other office holders do not represent everyone, only one particular group.  If  I support the other side, does that mean that my county and state representative will not work for me?  Once candidates from one level of government get involved in political campaigns at other levels of government, all moral authority is lost, and any action taken, no matter how innocuous, will be viewed through the prism of favoritism and cronyism.

Or what happens and the other side actually wins?  Will this completely poison the well, so to speak, of intergovernmental cooperation?  If I am the candidate whose state legislator opposed me and I win, will I really want to do anything to help the state?  Of course, that depends on the person.  In too many cases, the hurt is so deep, the seeds of distrust have been sown, and that obstacle cannot be overcome.  Personally, in my case, I understand the political process, having worked for the government pretty much since my first job with the City of University City Parks Department in 1982, so I know that sometimes party loyalty trumps all, as I know that both my County Commissioner and my State Representative are rock-ribbed Republicans, and the candidate that they chose to support is the candidate of the local Republican establishment.  While I understand why, that still doesn’t mean that I am extremely disappointed, as I am, as I expect my elected officials to at least try to be neutral, or show that they are neutral and objective.  Who they want to vote for is their own business, as as my choice of who I vote for.  But, I expect my elected officials to at least appear to be impartial and neutral, to at least put out the effort to represent me, even if I am not of the same party or did not vote for them.  (Disclaimer-  I am official registered in the state of Oklahoma as an Independent.)

Rest In Peace, My Friend

Friday, January 28th, 2011

For the past several years, I have been proud to consider as a friend and a client Mukesh Shah, a successful businessman in Tulsa.  A couple of weeks before Christmas, Mu asked me to visit his house to give him some engineering advice regarding some retaining wall and drainage issues, as he wanted to downsize from a two-story to a ranch and needed to get his house ship-shape before putting it on the market.  I spent the morning with Mu, giving him pointers and engineering advice.  A week later, right before Christmas, I gave him a copy of a plan for a retaining wall and drainage system that I had used on a similar house in Texas.  He was very excited that day, as he was planning on leaving for Egypt with his wife and children the next day.

I received a call from his daughter today asking me exactly what I had discussed with her father.  I must have sounded very puzzled.

“You don’t know that my father died, do you?”

I was blown away.  Here was someone that I had established both a professional and personal relationship with, and now he was dead.  I asked if he had died while in Egypt.  No, he died before they left.  He had had a heart attack and dropped dead not long after I had talked to him and he had told me about how excited he was about his trip.

Sometimes we don’t appreciate life and those people who are part of our lives enough.  I felt profoundly sad when I hung up the phone.  I was sad because I had lost a friend; I was also sad because I didn’t even know about it until a random phone call a month later.

Goodbye, Mu.  You will be missed by many.

Bullying Is Not A Good Way To Get What You Want

Thursday, December 16th, 2010

An easy divorce?  That’s something that exists in the land of unicorns and magic dragons.  I guess if one of the parties drops dead or disappears into the Amazon jungle it can be easy, but barring some extreme act of Fate, such a thing doesn’t exist.  As long as you have two people who disagreed enough to get a divorce, you will have two people that will still disagree with each other after the divorce.

My wife, for example, is still having to contend with actions that occurred when she was married to the other fellow, and that was over 4 years ago.  He wrote some bad checks, and since they couldn’t find him, and he and my wife were married at the time, they came after her, because he did the bad deed before the ink was dry on the divorce decree.  My ex and I have spent the better part of two years now disagreeing about what debt is hers, what is mine, what is both of ours, who pays what, why, when, and how.  Of course, because we cannot agree, we have to go to a third party, the courts, to help settle it for us.   Meanwhile, while we have to set aside funds for legal costs, we also have to live and pay our day-to-day bills while we wait and see what the ultimate resolution is.  These back debts, then, have been stick in limbo until the entire mess is sorted out.

Most of these creditors have been very decent and understanding about the situation.  After all, it is kind of hard to know what to pay if you don’t even know if you have to pay, and neither of us can afford to pay for things that we need not have to pay for.   Once creditor, however, has not been decent at all, and has been very obnoxious and demanding.  Out of the blue I received a call from this creditor several months again demanding payment – NOW!  As this is the newest of the bills being only a couple months old, I was a little annoyed.  After all, I explained, there have been creditors patiently waiting for the better part of two years to get their money, and they were the first in line and should get paid first.  Being nice, I said to give me all of the information and I would bring it up in court to see who should pay it, when it should be paid, and how it should be paid.  Being nice was a big mistake.  That was the end of September, and the court wasn’t ready to hear about in October, so the next opportunity is in January.

At the end of October, I got the official court documents that said that the unpaid bills were one of the issues that would be settled later, and explained that since neither my ex nor I would know what the court decides until it decides, that neither one of us can pay it off until that judgment is rendered.  The creditor wasn’t happy because that meant that money would not be paid NOW, but seemed to understand.  Seemed, being the appropriate modifier.

The week of Thanksgiving, this creditor once again called me and demanded payment NOW, that they didn’t give a damn what the court had said or was going to say, that one of us ws going to pay NOW or else!  I was furious.  This was someone that over the years my ex had given over $4000 to, and now this person was going to threaten us with collections over a paltry $200?  I stated to this person that I didn’t appreciate being bullied and extorted, that it is mind boggling that someone would throw away thousands of dollars of future business for such a paltry sum, a sum that represented less than 5 percent of the total that we had given to this person.  I was told that this money was desperately needed to keep the business afloat.  I’m sorry, but it is a pretty poor business person that gets in such a spot that $200 will make or break them.

Subsequent to that conversation, I heard from a third party that this particular business owner has a reputation of being a bully and suing people for pittances.  I have also heard about the extravagances and unnecessary expenditures, both in the business and in this person’s personal life.

Yesterday, I received a letter from a collection agency demanding payment.  I called the collection agency, and discovered that my ex had received one, too.  So, who owes it?  If we both pay it, then wouldn’t we be double paying?  I explained to the very nice representative the situation, that this particular debt was waiting on a decision by the court, which wouldn’t be for another month, at least.  No problem, I was told, they will wait.  Which makes sense, really, because if we both paid then we will have grossly overpaid and the collection agency could be sued for collecting funds that were not owed, and no collection agency wants to have to go to court.  It’s a hard job, and why make it more complicated?

So, we have a business owner who decided to be a bully.  Because of this – this person will not get their money any quicker than if they had waited for the court to render a decision; this person has now forever poison a business relationship that is worth thousands of dollars; this person has now made an enemy who vows to get the word out and start a boycott.  And for what?  A paltry 200 bucks.

The Credit Conundrum

Monday, December 13th, 2010

The credit counselors will tell you that to boost your credit score, you should always make sure that the balance on your credit cards is less than one-half of you total credit available. So, being someone who wants to maintain a good credit score, I have endeavored to do just that. After all, no one wants a bad credit score, right?

My reward for my efforts? A reduction in my credit line. Out of the blue I received a call from my credit card company telling me they were reducing my available credit. Now, suddenly, instead of being below that magic 50% number, I am almost maxed out on my card, as they pretty much lopped off all of my available credit. I went from almost $2000 available credit to $300. I was rather ticked. I asked the reason for the credit reduction? My debt to credit ratio was too high. The irony is that it wasn’t too high until they reduced my credit line. Talked about a circular argument – the action they took was justified by the action they took. In other words, if they hadn’t reduced my credit line, then my debt to credit ratio wouldn’t be bad enough to justify reducing my credit line.

Why do I think they did it? I think it’s because I didn’t spend all of the money available, and credit card companies make their money off of interest, and the more you spend, the more interest you pay. They even told me that they never reduce your credit line below what you have on the card, so if I would have maxed out the card, I wouldn’t have reduced my credit line.

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t!

Speaking of Jesus….

Tuesday, December 7th, 2010

There has been a big brouhaha in Tulsa about the name of the Christmas parade.  It seems that a couple of years ago, they changed the name of it to the “Holiday Parade”.  Our brilliant senior senator, The Honorable (I use that term loosely) James Inhofe, refuses to be in the parade unless the name is changed back, as he is a Christian, and they are trying to subjugate him and all Christians by removing the Christmas from the name of the parade.

It gets better.  Since all parade permits have to be approved by the Tulsa City Council, several of the councillors decided that they cannot be out-grandstanded by a U.S. Senator, and vowed to deny the permit unless the named was changed from “Holiday Parade” to “Christmas Parade”. 

Are you freakin’ kidding me?  Driving around Tulsa is like driving around a war-ravaged third world city; there are pot holes so big that tractor trailers get lost in them!  But no, it is more important to get into a tizzy about the use of “Holiday” instead of “Christmas”.  Last time I went to a Christmas parade, it was Santa and reindeer and marching bands and floats and candy and not Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, angels, shepherds, and three wise men.

Yes, Oklahomistan is alive and well!

Family site or just his?

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

The site says it is supposed to be about the whole family.. I was quite shocked to find the family album that was on the site before was not there anymore…and it made me very sad to know that there aren’t even pics of the Schrader Family on the Schrader Family website! What’s up with that? I understand if those pictures that were on there before were a little outdated. But couldn’t Aaaargh have updated them with newer pictures of his family showing how we were growing up? Wouldn’t that make more sense to have pictures of your family on the family website? Just sayin…That’s all I have to say on that subject.

Goodbye, Bruce!

Friday, March 5th, 2010

I am a talk radio junkie.  I start my morning with local personality Pat Campbell on KFAQ, then at 9 AM it’s a channel change to KRMG and Neal Boortz, at noon it’s Rush Limbaugh, then at 3 is Sean Hannity.  At 4 PM, I change channels once again, back to KFAQ and local personality Elvis Polo.  At 6, it’s KGGF out of Coffeyville, Kansas, for the Bruce Williams show.   Today will be the last day for KGGF, as it’s the last day for Bruce Williams, who is hanging up the microphone after 35 years on the air.

I have been listening to Bruce pretty much every evening on my drive home for the better part of five years now.  Unlike the other talkers, he does not dwell on politics, but talks about a variety of issues, ranging from buying a home to traffic signals.  His motto is – “If it’s important to you, we’ll talk about it!”  He was a refreshing alternative to the typical talk-radio fare.

Now, I am left with two alternatives – Michael Savage or Mark Levin.  I am not fond of either, although I like Savage better.  Or, I can listen to music.  Always an option, but music on the radio has grown stale – not enough variety as each station has become a “niche”.  I don’t know about you, but I have a wide musical taste, and see no problem listening to Nirvana, AC/DC, Frank Sinatra, Hank Jr., and Barry Manilow back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back without having to switch stations.  But that is just me.

Or, the other alternative is that I move my work schedule up an hour so that I am home at the end of the “Elvis Polo Show” at 6.  Hmm.  Not a bad idea!

Changes To The URL….Sort Of!

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Since I am actively looking for a new job, I am changing things around a little bit.  For the past several years, when you typed in www.t2s2.org, you were taken to the family home page, which had links to all kinds of personal stuff, including my singing, as well as a generic link to my resume and business-related stuff.  In other words, I was emphasizing the personal over the professional.

Since I am now seeking a new job, I am reversing the priority, and emphasizing the professional over the personal.  Now, when you type in www.t2s2.org, it will take you to the index for the business, which has a wealth of information on my professional experience.  There is not a link from the professional site to the personal one; it was only a one-way connection.  Therefore, you will have to remember that the blog is at t2s2.org/blog1.  I will still maintain the links within the blog to the other personal sites, such as “The Fine Print”.  Thanks for your patience and understanding, and have a Smurfy day!